Free PDF Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate - Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Authoritative Latest Exam Fee

Before the clients purchase our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study practice guide, they can have a free trial freely. The clients can log in our company's website and visit the pages of our products. The pages of our products lists many important information about our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam materials and they include the price, version and updated time of our products, the exam name and code, the total amount of the questions and answers, the merits of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate useful test guide and the discounts. You can have a comprehensive understanding of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate useful test guide after you see this information.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.
Topic 2	Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.
Topic 3	Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.
Topic 4	Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.

>> Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Fee <<

Free PDF Quiz 2025 Databricks Perfect Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Fee

On one hand, we adopt a reasonable price for you, ensures people whoever is rich or poor would have the equal access to buy our useful Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate real study dumps. On the other hand, we provide you the responsible 24/7 service. Our candidates might meet so problems during purchasing and using our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate prep guide, you can contact with us through the email, and we will give you respond and solution as quick as possible. With the commitment of helping candidates to Pass Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam, we have won wide approvals by our clients. We always take our candidates’ benefits as the priority, so you can trust us without any hesitation.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q51-Q56):

NEW QUESTION # 51
A Generative AI Engineer just deployed an LLM application at a digital marketing company that assists with answering customer service inquiries.
Which metric should they monitor for their customer service LLM application in production?

A. Final perplexity scores for the training of the model
B. Energy usage per query
C. Number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time
D. HuggingFace Leaderboard values for the base LLM

Answer: C

Explanation:
When deploying an LLM application for customer service inquiries, the primary focus is on measuring the operational efficiency and quality of the responses. Here's whyAis the correct metric:
* Number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time: This metric tracks the throughput of the customer service system, reflecting how many customer inquiries the LLM application can handle in a given time period (e.g., per minute or hour). High throughput is crucial in customer service applications where quick response times are essential to user satisfaction and business efficiency.
* Real-time performance monitoring: Monitoring the number of queries processed is an important part of ensuring that the model is performing well under load, especially during peak traffic times. It also helps ensure the system scales properly to meet demand.
Why other options are not ideal:
* B. Energy usage per query: While energy efficiency is a consideration, it is not the primary concern for a customer-facing application where user experience (i.e., fast and accurate responses) is critical.
* C. Final perplexity scores for the training of the model: Perplexity is a metric for model training, but it doesn't reflect the real-time operational performance of an LLM in production.
* D. HuggingFace Leaderboard values for the base LLM: The HuggingFace Leaderboard is more relevant during model selection and benchmarking. However, it is not a direct measure of the model's performance in a specific customer service application in production.
Focusing on throughput (inquiries processed per unit time) ensures that the LLM application is meeting business needs for fast and efficient customer service responses.

NEW QUESTION # 52
A Generative AI Engineer I using the code below to test setting up a vector store:

Assuming they intend to use Databricks managed embeddings with the default embedding model, what should be the next logical function call?

A. vsc.get_index()
B. vsc.similarity_search()
C. vsc.create_direct_access_index()
D. vsc.create_delta_sync_index()

Answer: D

Explanation:
Context: The Generative AI Engineer is setting up a vector store using Databricks' VectorSearchClient. This is typically done to enable fast and efficient retrieval of vectorized data for tasks like similarity searches.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: vsc.get_index(): This function would be used to retrieve an existing index, not create one, so it would not be the logical next step immediately after creating an endpoint.
* Option B: vsc.create_delta_sync_index(): After setting up a vector store endpoint, creating an index is necessary to start populating and organizing the data. The create_delta_sync_index() function specifically creates an index that synchronizes with a Delta table, allowing automatic updates as the data changes. This is likely the most appropriate choice if the engineer plans to use dynamic data that is updated over time.
* Option C: vsc.create_direct_access_index(): This function would create an index that directly accesses the data without synchronization. While also a valid approach, it's less likely to be the next logical step if the default setup (typically accommodating changes) is intended.
* Option D: vsc.similarity_search(): This function would be used to perform searches on an existing index; however, an index needs to be created and populated with data before any search can be conducted.
Given the typical workflow in setting up a vector store, the next step after creating an endpoint is to establish an index, particularly one that synchronizes with ongoing data updates, henceOption B.

NEW QUESTION # 53
A Generative Al Engineer is helping a cinema extend its website's chat bot to be able to respond to questions about specific showtimes for movies currently playing at their local theater. They already have the location of the user provided by location services to their agent, and a Delta table which is continually updated with the latest showtime information by location. They want to implement this new capability In their RAG application.
Which option will do this with the least effort and in the most performant way?

A. Set up a task in Databricks Workflows to write the information in the Delta table periodically to an external database such as MySQL and query the information from there as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.
B. implementation. Write the Delta table contents to a text column.then embed those texts using an embedding model and store these in the vector index Look up the information based on the embedding as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.
C. Query the Delta table directly via a SQL query constructed from the user's input using a text-to-SQL LLM in the agent logic / tool
D. Create a Feature Serving Endpoint from a FeatureSpec that references an online store synced from the Delta table. Query the Feature Serving Endpoint as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The task is to extend a cinema chatbot to provide movie showtime information using a RAG application, leveraging user location and a continuously updated Delta table, with minimal effort and high performance.
Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Create a Feature Serving Endpoint from a FeatureSpec that references an online store synced from the Delta table. Query the Feature Serving Endpoint as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Databricks Feature Serving provides low-latency access to real-time data from Delta tables via an online store. Syncing the Delta table to a Feature Serving Endpoint allows the chatbot to query showtimes efficiently, integrating seamlessly into the RAG agent'stool logic. This leverages Databricks' native infrastructure, minimizing effort and ensuring performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Feature Serving Endpoints provide real-time access to Delta table data with low latency, ideal for production systems"("Databricks Feature Engineering Guide," 2023).
* Option B: Query the Delta table directly via a SQL query constructed from the user's input using a text-to-SQL LLM in the agent logic / tool
* Using a text-to-SQL LLM to generate queries adds complexity (e.g., ensuring accurate SQL generation) and latency (LLM inference + SQL execution). While feasible, it's less performant and requires more effort than a pre-built serving solution.
* Databricks Reference:"Direct SQL queries are flexible but may introduce overhead in real-time applications"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Write the Delta table contents to a text column, then embed those texts using an embedding model and store these in the vector index. Look up the information based on the embedding as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Converting structured Delta table data (e.g., showtimes) into text, embedding it, and using vector search is inefficient for structured lookups. It's effort-intensive (preprocessing, embedding) and less precise than direct queries, undermining performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector search excels for unstructured data, not structured tabular lookups"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option D: Set up a task in Databricks Workflows to write the information in the Delta table periodically to an external database such as MySQL and query the information from there as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Exporting to an external database (e.g., MySQL) adds setup effort (workflow, external DB management) and latency (periodic updates vs. real-time). It's less performant and more complex than using Databricks' native tools.
* Databricks Reference:"Avoid external systems when Delta tables provide real-time data natively"("Databricks Workflows Guide").
Conclusion: Option A minimizes effort by using Databricks Feature Serving for real-time, low-latency access to the Delta table, ensuring high performance in a production-ready RAG chatbot.

NEW QUESTION # 54
A Generative AI Engineer wants to build an LLM-based solution to help a restaurant improve its online customer experience with bookings by automatically handling common customer inquiries. The goal of the solution is to minimize escalations to human intervention and phone calls while maintaining a personalized interaction. To design the solution, the Generative AI Engineer needs to define the input data to the LLM and the task it should perform.
Which input/output pair will support their goal?

A. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions
B. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Cancellation options
C. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Buttons that represent choices for booking details
D. Input: Customer reviews; Output: Classify review sentiment

Answer: C

Explanation:
Context: The goal is to improve the online customer experience in a restaurant by handling common inquiries about bookings, minimizing escalations, and maintaining personalized interactions.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Grouping and summarizing chat logs by user could provide insights into customer interactions but does not directly address the task of handling booking inquiries or minimizing escalations.
* Option B: Using chat logs to generate interactive buttons for booking details directly supports the goal of facilitating online bookings, minimizing the need for human intervention by providing clear, interactive options for customers to self-serve.
* Option C: Classifying sentiment of customer reviews does not directly help with booking inquiries, although it might provide valuable feedback insights.
* Option D: Providing cancellation options is helpful but narrowly focuses on one aspect of the booking process and doesn't support the broader goal of handling common inquiries about bookings.
Option Bbest supports the goal of improving online interactions by using chat logs to generate actionable items for customers, helping them complete booking tasks efficiently and reducing the need for human intervention.

NEW QUESTION # 55
A company has a typical RAG-enabled, customer-facing chatbot on its website.

Select the correct sequence of components a user's questions will go through before the final output is returned. Use the diagram above for reference.

A. 1.context-augmented prompt, 2.vector search, 3.embedding model, 4.response-generating LLM
B. 1.response-generating LLM, 2.vector search, 3.context-augmented prompt, 4.embedding model
C. 1.response-generating LLM, 2.context-augmented prompt, 3.vector search, 4.embedding model
D. 1.embedding model, 2.vector search, 3.context-augmented prompt, 4.response-generating LLM

Answer: D

Explanation:
To understand how a typical RAG-enabled customer-facing chatbot processes a user's question, let's go through the correct sequence as depicted in the diagram and explained in option A:
* Embedding Model (1):The first step involves the user's question being processed through an embedding model. This model converts the text into a vector format that numerically represents the text. This step is essential for allowing the subsequent vector search to operate effectively.
* Vector Search (2):The vectors generated by the embedding model are then used in a vector search mechanism. This search identifies the most relevant documents or previously answered questions that are stored in a vector format in a database.
* Context-Augmented Prompt (3):The information retrieved from the vector search is used to create a context-augmented prompt. This step involves enhancing the basic user query with additional relevant information gathered to ensure the generated response is as accurate and informative as possible.
* Response-Generating LLM (4):Finally, the context-augmented prompt is fed into a response- generating large language model (LLM). This LLM uses the prompt to generate a coherent and contextually appropriate answer, which is then delivered as the final output to the user.
Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B, C, D: These options suggest incorrect sequences that do not align with how a RAG system typically processes queries. They misplace the role of embedding models, vector search, and response generation in an order that would not facilitate effective information retrieval and response generation.
Thus, the correct sequence isembedding model, vector search, context-augmented prompt, response- generating LLM, which is option A.

NEW QUESTION # 56
......

We are one of the largest and the most confessional dealer of Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice materials for we have been professional in this career for over ten years. And we have enough strenght on this filed. That is why our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate actual exam outreaches others greatly among substantial suppliers of the exam. Getting place great orders with competitive prices and unquestionable quality for your information, the excellency of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions is obvious. Just come and buy them!

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate New Practice Questions: https://www.actual4exams.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-valid-dump.html

Jim Gray Jim Gray

Biografía

Free PDF Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate - Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Authoritative Latest Exam Fee

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Free PDF Quiz 2025 Databricks Perfect Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Fee

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q51-Q56):

CONTACTANOS

Direccion

Horarios de Atencion